ROGER AND FRANCES' DISCUSSION BOARD Login as administrator
Go to Top  |  New Topic  |  Go to Topic  |  Search 
 Subject: RE: FX-39
 
Author: Roger Hicks
Date:   1/28/2006 9:28 am FWDT
Dear Dud,

Here's an even less palatable possibility: you were underexposing. This actually seems slightly more likely than heavy overexposure, given that it was the sunny shots and you're using an FM3A. What metering technique were you using? And what EI?

Of course you can tell that by looking at shadow detail but your reference to histograms should have alerted me.

Cheers,

Roger
Reply To This Message
 Previous Message  |  Next Message

 Topics Author  Date IP Address      
 FX-39   new  
 dud 1/26/2006 8:31 pm FWDT 86.130.5.224
 RE: FX-39   new  
 Roger Hicks 1/27/2006 10:36 am FWDT 86.196.231.138
 RE: FX-39   new  
 dud 1/27/2006 7:14 pm FWDT 86.130.5.224
 RE: FX-39    
 Roger Hicks 1/28/2006 9:28 am FWDT 86.196.156.196
 RE: FX-39   new  
 dud 1/29/2006 0:51 am FWDT 86.130.5.224
 RE: FX-39   new  
 John 3/27/2006 4:11 pm FWDT 64.12.117.9
 RE: FX-39   new  
 dud 3/27/2006 7:06 pm FWDT 86.129.254.154
 RE: FX-39   new  
 John 3/28/2006 7:20 pm FWDT 152.163.101.9
 RE: FX-39   new  
 dud 3/28/2006 8:34 pm FWDT 86.129.254.154
 RE: FX-39   new  
 John 3/28/2006 11:41 pm FWDT 205.188.116.69
 apple coupon ipod    new  
 Viollio 7/1/2007 1:08 pm FWDT 67.183.66.110
 the longest yard    new  
 Humionas 7/2/2007 10:05 pm FWDT 67.176.170.175
 in iraq war    new  
 Prostinila 7/5/2007 4:57 am FWDT 24.59.206.46
 Previous Topic  |  Next Topic
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 59 - 44? *  
* indicates required field