Author: Dale
Date: 5/26/2012 8:52 am
|
My thoughts LENR today.
Friday, May 25, 2012
9:47 PM
Here are comments from Ransom and answers from Dale.
Author: Ransom
Date: 5/24/2012 3:56 pm
Dale:
I have reviewed the drawings, etc. I know Lui has been doing a review also and had some questions, some associated with the fuel (powder v wire and how hydrogen is added and pressure maintained).
My question is, what next?
Since we started our joint venture the world has continued to turn as has the LENR saga. Based on what I see now, I would make the following observations:
1) No one has shown a commercial product and whether Rossi, DGT or Piantelli (or any of the others) will show one in the near future is uncertain.
Comment by Dale: Obvious that there was enough observed in tangible form to provoke others you mention in addition to possible many others attempting commercialization of many types of LENR products. Important is that there is a reactor that gives a result which is a mechanical issue. There will be a commercial LENR product that develops for many at the same time but only "after" the proper reactor is designed and made available for others to easily experiment with. Establishing constants are a must for the proper development of LENR.
2) Randy comment-I think NASA and others may be way ahead of the curve in understanding how this all works.
Dale comment-LENR has been worked on for over 10 years at NASA, many developments have been made and there is an engine operating off the technology right now. NASA is only doing damage control to the general public and making those statements now before other countries think "they" are the leaders in this field, this will cause WW3 as a result. Rossi only got wind of this and then he got interested and jumped as high as he could with the possibilities, he forced others to take notice. NASA has the technology refined already, everyone needs to accept that fact.
3)Randy comment- Any device designed before we understand LENR may not be suited to initiate, maintain or control the reaction. So while your device is elegant (and use of the glow plugs seems to be an important part of DGT etc.) I don't think we can know if it is suited for a LENR reaction.
Dale comment-Thank you Randy, that is well taken coming from you "elegant". Our reactor is not only elegant but it will be the reactor everyone will finally find out is "the reactor" which will produced stabilized reactions at a higher level. Understanding will come after a standard reactor is developed for others to experiment with. According to all of the statements reviewed from multiple writings from the people experimenting with this upcoming LENR revolution the understood part is what they have stated causes something to be observed. By the way those glow plugs were our design and Defkalion followed us. Also there are some real questionable issues regarding the synchronicity of Defkalion, the glow plugs, X-workshop, reactor head with three extra spark plug connectors, and NASA right now as we speak. Also we do not know if our reactor "is not" suited for a LENR reaction, meaning some base foundation needs to be established with an intelligently designed reactor.
4) Randy comment-I would really like to do some testing to see what we see, but I am not sure of the cost of manufacturing your device or if it can be used to trigger, maintain or control a reaction. So is the timing right.
So I guess I would like to know what the cost would be to complete the patent process on the device, the cost to manufacture a prototype and whether that seems doing at this point and/or worthwhile.
Dale comment-To do testing we need a solid reactor we can test multiple reactions at the same time, and for example like running differential tests on electrical circuitry with a quad display scope, a dual trace is not so helpful when you have the choice of multiple displays all recording differentials of tested circuitry. All tests should happen at the same time with the same elements.
Randy comment-I have really been busy and wanted to call you this week but the days are slipping by. I'd appreciate your written thoughts which may be a better way to communicate.
Dale comment-My thoughts lean heavily on geometry and fuel preparation and having a well designed reactor that can handle multiple reactions within a safe environment. The experimenting will go on by those moving forward and it is not likely that the fundamental issues recited over the past 2 years will change. Once we get a reactor that can be manufactured easily and less expensive than anyone else's we need to proceed with the design paperwork, fulfill the required needs to cause a reaction, and produce the kit Lui wanted.
I will be drawing more detailed drawings for manufacturing and they will be more clear than the non obvious patent drawings. 3D will happen once all the engineering challenges are solved and we are moving forward. Information will flow swiftly for a time and then LENR will become our reality.
|
|
