Author: Dale
Date: 2/24/2012 2:28 pm
|
We have a timemarker regarding a mistake made on the part of Ransom's post. I wanted to bring forward mistakes as they are made due to lack of that person experiencing them prior. What Ransom did and if he is allowed to speak for Lui both are considered one in fact of agreements signed.
Therefore this is only an example to our team in the seriousness of following all USPTO Rules.
In technicality by admission Ransom just gave myself and deighta team full rights to the patent reactor HE series concept 2. He made a statement that indicates that even team doesn't see a usage in the LEarNeR kit and that HE concept is not acceptable for your idea to be reduced into practice.
Ransom I would argue that in Federal Court proceedings and that; require your answers to that interrogetory in writing.
How do you answer to that?
|
|
