Author: Dale
Date: 2/26/2012 4:41 am
|
I know you may not see it now in this design concept2 but since none of us had any drawings or specifics we should start somewhere and no one has tested multichamer bores for fuel. You never know it could possibly be some type of benefit, the importance is we have to start somewhere with something factual.
I am urging this design to be accepted as the first test reactor and when we load one at a time and get usage of multiple cylinders for the exact same price as making a one chanmbered design or a lesser model experimental reactor then we can go ahead and do that also as I anticipate you will want to try your own design versions.
I had to get something designed to get moving on this, we can change it all we want but it will first delay the manufacturing of it and this design is from many hours of reviewing variables and needed test results.
The LEarNeR kit will be the beneficiary of the results of a multi chamber test reactor. If it is so simple why would it matter? at least I had a plan and formula, and didn't just flip a coin to begin drawing.
It takes quite alot of paperwork to produce enough information for the provisional draft and there are several requirements of non obviousness that are required to validate a U.S. patent. One way to make sure of success is to design your own product the way you anticipate it to be useful to others, at the same time providing as many additional features as possible for the resulting product. |
|
