Today is

RIGHTDIVISION.COM DISCUSSION FORUM Login as administrator
Go to Top  |  New Topic  |  Go to Topic  |  Search 
 Subject: RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2
 
Author: Mike Holt
Date:   8/24/2003 5:53 pm CDT
You stated " I have never seen anyone so eager to change the subject or topic as fast as you. What are you trying to hide from? Is it something that you are not confident about and may have already written in error? "
I have no fear of what THINK that you may disprove in me. I have NO FEAR of what you perceive to prove.
The point concerning Acts 13 and Acts 28 is that YOU teach that Paul's revelations were progressive. That is totally wrong. Paul had all the revelation that he needed for his ministry. Basically, I am snatching the rug out from under you. As a MidActs dispy, what you will say eventually is that Paul wrote about what he did know and that GOD gave more truth later. You will need to say this to defend your false views. It is the SOP of all the MidActs people that will not admit that they are deceived.
If you are different from that, then that is great! WOW. BUT, I just find when I talk to MidActs preachers and teachers about such things that they EXCUSE the fact that what Paul practices before Acts 28 is different than afterwards, not because it is 2 entirely different dispensations, but because he "did the best that the had with what he received". They will say that Paul STOPPED baptizing during Acts because of the "progressive revelations" when in fact, he baptized in accordance with the kingdom program. They will say that the reason that Paul did not write about the heavenly places is because it was not time for it yet. You see, if you ever divide Paul's word, you will see that MIdActs dispensationalism is wayyyyyyyyyy out. It can not be defended with the word.
BUT, I don't expect you to understand this...you are blinded by your own traditions and hardened heart.
Reply To This Message
 Previous Message  |  Next Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/9/2003 3:07 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/18/2003 4:53 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/19/2003 7:23 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/22/2003 6:10 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/22/2003 6:43 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/23/2003 7:56 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/23/2003 2:17 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/23/2003 6:49 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/23/2003 6:53 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/24/2003 9:17 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/24/2003 9:22 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/24/2003 10:11 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/24/2003 10:22 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/24/2003 10:42 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/24/2003 11:32 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/24/2003 12:33 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/24/2003 12:36 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/24/2003 12:55 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/24/2003 11:37 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/24/2003 12:52 am CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/24/2003 1:11 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/24/2003 3:29 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 John Clemens 8/24/2003 4:10 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2    
 Mike Holt 8/24/2003 5:53 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Ben E Morgan 8/24/2003 5:09 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Mike Holt 8/24/2003 5:41 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 Webmaster 8/24/2003 6:39 pm CDT
 RE: Acts 13 and the Body-part 2   new  
 S. WAYNE DUNAWAY 12/6/2004 10:27 pm CDT
 Previous Topic  |  Next Topic
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 67 + 7? *  
* indicates required field