ROGER AND FRANCES' DISCUSSION BOARD Login as administrator
 Subject: Paterson
 
Author: dud
Date:   3/25/2006 11:11 am FWDT
I just read the news that Paterson are to stop making their brand of developers. As I had pretty much standardised on Paterson developers (FX-39, Aculux and FX-50) this is a serious blow.

In common with most people who have used them I'm delighted by the speed, tonality, fine grain, and ability to get a good result from almost any film that these developers provide.

Obvioulsy I'd like to find replacements with all the same qualities.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

I'm sure someone is going to say XTOL and I have used and rate this developer, but side by side comparison with FX-39 XTOL negatives are just slightly soft to my eyes. This is not a scientific test, I agree, but it is my eyes that get to judge the final print and excellent as it is I don't think I would be happy with XTOL.

Many thanks for all suggestions (even the ones to try Rodinal ;-)
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date IP Address      
 Paterson    
dud 3/25/2006 11:11 am FWDT 86.129.254.154
 RE: Paterson   new  
Roger Hicks 3/25/2006 5:21 pm FWDT 86.196.221.246
 RE: Paterson   new  
dud 3/26/2006 5:26 pm FWDT 86.129.254.154
 RE: Paterson   new  
John 3/27/2006 3:34 pm FWDT 64.12.117.9
 RE: Paterson   new  
dud 3/27/2006 7:33 pm FWDT 86.129.254.154
 RE: Paterson   new  
John 3/28/2006 7:05 pm FWDT 152.163.101.9
 RE: Paterson   new  
Roger Hicks 3/29/2006 5:13 pm FWDT 86.201.198.88
 RE: Paterson   new  
dud 3/31/2006 5:53 pm FWDT 86.129.254.154
 RE: Paterson   new  
Roger Hicks 4/2/2006 1:59 pm FWDT 86.196.162.43
 RE: Paterson   new  
Keith Tapscott. 4/25/2006 7:20 pm FWDT 88.105.211.64
 RE: Paterson   new  
artemis 4/27/2006 11:54 pm FWDT 80.229.219.125
 RE: Paterson   new  
John 4/28/2006 3:52 am FWDT 152.163.101.9
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 50 - 50? *  
* indicates required field