Today is

RIGHTDIVISION.COM DISCUSSION FORUM Login as administrator
Go to Top  |  New Topic  |  Go to Topic  |  Search 
 Subject: RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine
 
Author: Randy Campbell
Date:   7/29/2003 10:15 am CDT
Kudos Mark. Very well said. I even think by the standards of God, the king James is poor. Now that being said, King James I use the most. But A good companion with that, if you don't want to use Hebrew or Greek lexicons, is The RESTORED NAMES KING JAMES, And the 1901 American Standard Version. But that is just my oppinion.

Reply To This Message
 Previous Message  |  Next Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 Mark 7/21/2003 10:52 am CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine    
 Randy Campbell 7/29/2003 10:15 am CDT
 German Language - King James   new  
 Mark Warbinek 7/29/2003 12:36 am CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 The0 12/5/2003 12:50 am CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 Paul 2/28/2004 8:26 am CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 Genesis 6/1/2004 7:49 am CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 Rebecca 4/8/2007 11:49 am CDT
 Why the King James Version if POOR   new  
 Light 4/29/2007 5:26 pm CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 Leland Maples 5/8/2007 12:37 am CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 jennifer ross 6/22/2009 12:20 am CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 jennifer ross 6/22/2009 12:20 am CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 jennifer ross 6/22/2009 11:51 am CDT
 RE: Poor Translations Cause False Doctrine   new  
 Darryl 6/28/2009 7:35 pm CDT
 Previous Topic  |  Next Topic
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 93 - 42? *  
* indicates required field