FOOT HEALTH FORUM Login as administrator
 Subject: RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker
 
Author: Bernie Secoura
Date:   3/13/2005 7:09 am PDT


Dr. Jay wrote:
-------------------------------
You just made my point. Lies, rhetoric, hate and slick talk are all you have to offer. Doctors should do what is best for the patient and minimally invasive surgery is best for the patient.
===================
Oh contraire, Mr. Jay. Unlike YOU, I am NOT a "one trick pony" who only raises his head out of his own self-indulgent sand to chime in on the singular topic in which he has a proprietary interest . . the scamming of the public for the aggrandizement of his bottom line.

Look about you in this forum, Mr. Jay, and check out the frequency, the scope and the quality of MY replies. Then put YOUR own name into the search engine and see what comes up. If you have anything of real value to offer those who come here, often in desperate search of answers to their foot problems, then let's have it. But if the extent of your "professional" skill and expertise is the evident selling of the patently ludicrous notion that the blind inserting of a rapidly rotating side-cutting bur into tissues which will most likely be collaterally mangled in the process, though such will be conveniently hidden from your eyes by virtue of the inadequate incision through which your crude instrument is introduced, bestows upon you the right to call yourself a doctor, much less a surgeon, then that point is effectively made by this sudden need to interject your two-cents herein, and therefore your trouble may not have been for naught.

Comments such as yours serve their purpose . . though not necessarily YOUR intent.
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Capote 3/6/2005 2:03 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Zuckerman 3/8/2005 10:04 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. S. Arbes 3/17/2005 11:50 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Bernie Secoura 3/17/2005 6:51 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Jay 3/12/2005 1:11 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Bernie Secoura 3/12/2005 2:17 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Jay 3/13/2005 6:11 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker    
Bernie Secoura 3/13/2005 7:09 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Jay 3/13/2005 9:49 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Bernie Secoura 3/13/2005 12:49 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. S. Arbes 3/19/2005 9:28 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Bernie Secoura 3/20/2005 9:20 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Jay 3/13/2005 3:53 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Bernie Secoura 3/13/2005 5:22 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Jay 3/13/2005 6:27 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Bernie Secoura 3/13/2005 8:26 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Jay 3/13/2005 9:13 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Bernie Secoura 3/13/2005 10:11 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Jay 3/13/2005 10:27 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Bernie Secoura 3/14/2005 12:46 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Jay 3/13/2005 3:57 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Daniel Tucker, DPM, FACFAS 3/21/2005 11:54 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Capote 3/21/2005 11:13 pm PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Daniel J. Tucker, DPM, FACFAS 3/27/2005 9:16 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Capote 3/29/2005 0:12 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Capote 4/6/2005 7:02 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. Capote 4/6/2005 7:03 am PDT
 RE: MIS & Dr. Daniel Tucker   new  
Dr. R. Westheimer 4/28/2005 6:45 am PDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 64 - 12? *  
* indicates required field